Files in This Item:
|Dokument Type:||Habilitation||metadata.dc.title:||Nominal and real rigidities in monetary stochastic dynamic general equilibrium models of the business cycle
Nominale und reale Rigiditäten in monetären dynamischen stochastischen allgemeinen Gleichgewichtsmodellen des Konjunkturzyklus
|Authors:||Gail, Michael||Institute:||Fachbereich 5, Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Wirtschaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsrecht||Free keywords:||rigide Preise, optimale Geldpolitik, Neue Neoklassische Synthese, Persistenz, monetärer Transmissionsprozess, New Neoclassical Synthesis, Sticky Prices, Monetary Transmission Mechanism, Persistence, Sticky Wages||Dewey Decimal Classification:||330 Wirtschaft||GHBS-Clases:||PRO||Issue Date:||2004||Publish Date:||2007||Abstract:||
The purpose of the present study is to explore the specific contributions of various
nominal and real rigidities in monetary DGE models in a systematic way and in
a common framework. I will concentrate on a quite simple model setup in order
to find out the important transmission mechanisms at work. The focus will be on
exogenous money growth shocks as the driving force of the business cycle and not
on interest rate shocks. The book contains five main chapters. All these chapters are presented in a way
that allows the reader to study them separately. Therefore the building blocks of
the models will be repeated in every chapter. The first four chapters are concerned
with the question which rigidities are essential to explain actual business cycles while
Chapter 6 analyzes optimal monetary policy in a stochastic DGE model.
In Chapter 2 the basic model is presented. Prices are set in a staggered way
as in Taylor (1980). The chapter addresses two questions that have not yet been
answered in the literature. First: Is there a difference between money introduced
via a CIA-constraint or via a MIU-specification? Second: Does it matter how the
household’s preferences look like? The answers are yes in both cases. It turns out
that the CIA-model with a standard CRRA utility function can better account for
the business cycle. Thus in Chapter 3 the MIU-setup as well as GHH preferences
will be discarded. But the model will be augmented by capital accumulation considerations.
The chapter considers instead the implications of the price setting scheme:
Taylor pricing is compared to Calvo pricing. It turns out that the failure of the basic
model to generate persistent output responses is due to Taylor type price staggering.
The model version with Calvo pricing can account quite well for the empirical
impulse responses, confirming the results of Kiley (2002) in a more general setup.
Chapter 4 considers the role of habits in consumption. While this feature has
already been analyzed by others, e.g. Christiano, Eichenbaum and Evans (2003),
there is no study that tries to figure out the specific effects of habit formation in
isolation. In addition, related studies use Calvo pricing. Here the MIU-model with
Taylor price staggering will again be considered in order to examine whether this
can improve the model with respect to its ability to create persistence in output.
Unfortunately only the response of consumption to a money growth shock can be
improved. For a high enough value of the habit persistence parameter consumption
can even be hump-shaped, as it is empirically (see Figure 1.4).
Chapter 5 presents a model with Taylor wage staggering and adjustment costs
of price changes as in Rotemberg (1982). It turns out that this specific combination
is important to get persistent output responses to a money growth shock. When
using also Taylor price staggering the result breaks down and output and prices will
not be persistent. Sticky prices through adjustment costs of prices operate similar
as sticky prices under Calvo pricing. When they interact with adjustment costs of
capital they can even strengthen the persistence in output. In the absence of the
costs for adjusting the capital stock there are only very moderate effects on output.
Chapter 6 goes a step further. Here the question is not whether a monetary
stochastic DGE model can generate persistence but whether a central bank can
stabilize the price level as claimed by King and Wolman (1999). The analysis builds
upon the framework used before: the household maximizes life-time utility and firms
maximize profits. The central bank acts as a social planner that takes into account
the optimizing behavior of the household and the firms. Maximizing welfare is then
equivalent to maximizing utility of the representative household. It is shown that
the result of King and Wolman does not hold under a different specification of the
preference function so that in general the monetary authority will not be successful
in completely stabilizing the price level, as is also observed empirically. Chapter 7 summarizes the main findings and gives some suggestions for future research while Chapter 1 discusses briefly important advances in macroeconomic theory as well as in empirical methods to characterize the business cycle.
|Appears in Collections:||Hochschulschriften|
This item is protected by original copyright
checked on Nov 26, 2022
checked on Nov 26, 2022
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.