Citation link: http://dx.doi.org/10.25819/ubsi/10131
DC FieldValueLanguage
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8928-8594-
dc.contributor.authorFuss, Theodora-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-26T07:20:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-26T07:20:52Z-
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.descriptionFinanziert aus dem Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der Universität Siegen für Zeitschriftenartikelde
dc.description.abstractThe idea of “smart is sexy,” meaning superior cognition provides competitive benefits in mate choice and, therefore, evolutionary advantages in terms of reproductive fitness, is both exciting and captivating. Cognitively flexible individuals perceive and adapt more dynamically to (unpredictable) environmental changes. The sex roles that females and males adopt within their populations can vary greatly in response to the prevalent mating system. Based on how cognition determines these grossly divergent sex roles, different selection pressures could possibly shape the (progressive) evolution of cognitive abilities, suggesting the potential to induce sexual dimorphisms in superior cognitive abilities. Associations between an individual’s mating success, sexual traits and its cognitive abilities have been found consistently across vertebrate species and taxa, providing evidence that sexual selection may well shape the supporting cognitive prerequisites. Yet, while superior cognitive abilities provide benefits such as higher feeding success, improved antipredator behavior, or more favorable mate choice, they also claim costs such as higher energy levels and metabolic rates, which in turn may reduce fecundity, growth, or immune response. There is compelling evidence in a variety of vertebrate taxa that females appear to prefer skilled problem-solver males, i.e., they prefer those that appear to have better cognitive abilities. Consequently, cognition is also likely to have substantial effects on sexual selection processes. How the choosing sex assesses the cognitive abilities of potential mates has not been explored conclusively yet. Do cognitive skills guide an individual’s mate choice and does learning change an individual’s mate choice decisions? How and to which extent do individuals use their own cognitive skills to assess those of their conspecifics when choosing a mate? How does an individual’s role within a mating system influence the choice of the choosing sex in this context? Drawing on several examples from the vertebrate world, this review aims to elucidate various aspects associated with cognitive sex differences, the different roles of males and females in social and sexual interactions, and the potential influence of cognition on mate choice decisions. Finally, future perspectives aim to identify ways to answer the central question of how the triad of sex, cognition, and mate choice interacts.en
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25819/ubsi/10131-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ub.uni-siegen.de/handle/ubsi/2220-
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:hbz:467-22204-
dc.language.isoende
dc.sourceFrontiers in Ecology and Evolution ; 9 (2021). - https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.749495de
dc.subject.ddc590 Tiere (Zoologie)de
dc.subject.otherBehavioral flexibilityen
dc.subject.otherSexual selectionen
dc.subject.otherSocial cognitionen
dc.subject.otherCognitive flexibilityen
dc.subject.otherSexual dimophismen
dc.subject.swbGeschlechtsunterschiedde
dc.subject.swbGeschlechterrollede
dc.subject.swbSoziale Wahrnehmungde
dc.titleMate choice, sex roles and sexual cognition in vertebrates: mate choice turns cognition or cognition turns mate choice?en
dc.typeArticlede
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
ubsi.publication.affiliationInstitut für Biologiede
ubsi.source.doi10.3389/fevo.2021.749495-
ubsi.source.issn2296-701X-
ubsi.source.issued2021de
ubsi.source.issuenumber9de
ubsi.source.pages15de
ubsi.source.placeLausannede
ubsi.source.publisherFrontiers Mediade
ubsi.source.titleFrontiers in Ecology and Evolutionde
ubsi.subject.ghbsVQWde
ubsi.subject.ghbsVOOde
Appears in Collections:Geförderte Open-Access-Publikationen
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Fuss_Mate_choice_1.pdf975.55 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Show simple item record

Page view(s)

258
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Download(s)

66
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.