Wagner, Johannes
Preferred name
Wagner, Johannes
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Access status: Open Access , Bibliometric study on the use of machine learning as resolution technique for Facility Layout ProblemsFacility Layout Problems (FLP) are concerned with finding efficient factory layouts. Numerous resolution approaches are known in literature for layout optimization. Among those, intelligent approaches are less researched than solutions from exact or approximating approaches. The recent surge of research interest in Artificial Intelligence, and specifically Machine Learning (ML) techniques, presages an increase of such techniques' usage in FLP. However, previous reviews on FLP research induce that, to date, this trend has not yet emerged. Utilizing a systematic literature review coupled with a k-Means based clustering algorithm, we analyzed 25 relevant publication full-texts from an original sample of 1,425 papers. Our findings corroborate the statement that ML techniques have attracted substantially less research interest than most other resolution approaches. While a few papers used Unsupervised Learning algorithms directly as a solution to the FLP, Supervised and Reinforcement Learning were found to be practically irrelevant. ML usage was significantly higher in FLP-adjacent planning tasks such as group technology. Drawing from experiences with other NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems in manufacturing research, we conclude that Reinforcement Learning is most promising to bridge the evident gap between FLP and ML research. Our study further contributes to FLP research by extending established classification frameworks.Source Type:Article407 290 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Access status: Open Access , Machine learning-based prediction of missing components for assembly - a case study at an engineer-to-order manufacturerFor manufacturing companies, especially for machine and plant manufacturers, the assembly of products in time has an essential impact on meeting delivery dates. Often missing individual components lead to a delayed assembly start, hereinafter referred to as assembly start delayers. Identifying the assembly start delayers early in the production process can help to set countermeasures to meet the required delivery dates. In order to achieve this, we set up 24 prediction models on four different levels of detail utilizing different machine learning-algorithms - six prediction models on every level of detail - and applying a case-based research approach in order to identify the model with the highest model quality. The modeling approach on the four levels of detail is different. The models on the coarsest level of detail predict assembly start delayers utilizing a classification approach. The models on the three finer levels of detail predict assembly start delayers via a regression of different lead times and subsequent postprocessing operations to identify the assembly start delayers. After training of the 24 prediction models based on a real data set of a machine and plant manufacturer and evaluating their model quality, the classification model utilizing a Gradient Boosting classifier showed best results. Thus, performing a binary classification to identify assembly start delayers was the best modelling approach. With the achieved results, our study is a first approach to predict assembly start delayers and gives insights in the performance of different modeling approaches in the area of a production planning and control.Source Type:Article2 9
