Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    PublicationAccess status: Open Access ,
    Cooperation and difference
    The article examines the fundamental role of cooperation and difference in ethnographic research. We use camera ethnography in our research project B05 “Early Childhood and Smartphone. Family Interaction Order, Learning Processes and Cooperation” to reveal the iconographic aspects of media practices and to examine their choreographies in space and time. This enables us to engage with aspects such as embodiment, materiality, and perception in early childhood and learning. Rather than using video technology to produce recordings of a ‘reality’ assumed to be simply there and filmable, a key methodological premise of camera ethnography is that the visibility of an object of research is not given a priori but has to be generated by media ethnographic research practices. Hence, ethnographic research practices are epistemic practices and constitute “epistemic things” (see Rheinberger 2006; Knorr-Cetina 1999). To discover and investigate media practices in early childhood involves building, shaping, and maintaining relationships of cooperation and difference.
    Source Type:
    Journal:
    Volume number:
      456  125
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Publication
    Kamera-Ethnographie
    Kamera-Ethnographie ist ein filmischer Ansatz zur Gestaltung der Wahrnehmungs- und Wissensprozesse beim ethnographischen Forschen. Dabei wird im Unterschied zur Logik der Aufzeichnung angenommen, dass Forschungsgegenstände zunächst noch gar nicht sichtbar sind. Kameraführung, Schnitt und Montage tragen als experimentelle Praktiken zur Beobachtbarkeit und Sichtbarkeit epistemischer Dinge bei. Bina Elisabeth Mohns repräsentationskritische Programmschrift zeigt, wie die Methode der Kamera-Ethnographie auch nonverbale Praktiken in ihren Choreographien und bildhaften Figuren in den Blick rückt. Eine situierte Methodologie und reflexive Pragmatik leiten zum positionierten Hinschauen und Sehenlernen an und binden selbst das Publikum in eine forschende Rezeption ein.
    Source Type:
      4
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    PublicationAccess status: Open Access ,
    Media ethnography
    Contents Editorial Thematic Focus: Media Ethnography Media Ethnography and Participation in Online Practices / David Waldecker, Kathrin Englert, Wolfgang Ludwig-Mayerhofer, Oliver Schmidtke The Story is Everywhere. Dispersed Situations in a Literary Role Play Game / Wolfgang Reißmann Co-operation and/as Participant Observation: Reflections on Ethnographic Fieldwork in Morocco / Simon Holdermann Ethnomethodological Media Ethnography: Exploring Everyday Digital Practices in Families with Young Children / Clemens Eisenmann, Jan Peter, Erik Wittbusch Cooperation and Difference. Camera Ethnography in the Research Project ‘Early Childhood and Smartphone’ / Bina E. Mohn, Pip Hare, Astrid Vogelpohl, Jutta Wiesemann Reports Coordinations, or Computing is Work / Sebastian Gießmann
    Source Type:
    Journal:
    Volume number:
      3  16
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    PublicationAccess status: Open Access ,
    Prototyp „Bundle Explorer: Berühren“
    The Bundle Explorer: Touch is the prototype of a praxeological research platform for studying situated practices. Its conceptualization draws upon Wittgenstein’s work and his method of grammatical investigation. With its pool of diverse filmic ‘prepared specimens’ from the research project Early Childhood and Smartphone, the tool facilitates a comparative, probing, and contouring procedure that opens up new perspectives on touch practices in digital everyday life. This working paper recounts the context and process of the Bundle Explorer’s development, and outlines how to work with it. Considering grammatical investigation (Wittgenstein), praxeological bundle theory (drawing on Schatzki), and camera ethnography alongside one another, the paper develops methodological proposals for ways to address the following questions: How can a language-game analysis be deployed to study nonverbal practices, and how can bundle theory serve to discern how practices are situated? How can we bring Schatzki’s flat ontology together with Wittgensteinian thought, and to what extent can Wittgenstein’s übersichtliche Darstellung be seen as an experimental field that transcends medial and cultural boundaries? How could presentational grammar work? In this paper, the term ‘touch’ stands as a proxy for changing semantic fields in changing lifeworlds.
    Source Type:
    Series:
    Volume number:
      7  7