Ibrahimova, Ganira
3 results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Access status: Metadata only , Colonialism versus independence—the role of entrepreneurial ecosystems in Azerbaijan over time(2023); Entrepreneurial activity, its emergence, and development are considered important for the well-being of nations, especially for those in transition from one economic system or industrial setting into another. A crucial question is, why countries with similar basic resources develop differently regarding entrepreneurial activities over time? This study delivers new insights on ecosystems developing during different historical eras, and why some ecosystem factors have an impact not only during one point in time but also in the long term. The paper focuses on Azerbaijan, a country with a turbulent history, and volatile formal institutions, endowed with natural resources, and now heavily dependent on the export of oil and gas. To transform the economy and overcome this resource dependency, entrepreneurial activities could provide one solution; however, the contribution of entrepreneurship to the economic development and growth remains low. This paper provides an analysis of why the promise of entrepreneurship remains quite elusive in Azerbaijan. The study contributes to the literature on entrepreneurship by drawing on archival data to gain insights on how the historical role of entrepreneurship and the underlying ecosystem have imprinted their long-term development of current entrepreneurial activities. It proposes a framework for a systematic and long-term analysis of the factors and mechanisms comprising the ecosystem approach and shaping entrepreneurial outcomes across a broad spectrum of historical and contemporary contexts.Source Type:Article2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Access status: Open Access , Navigating Transition: The Role of Formal and Informal Institutions in Shaping Entrepreneurial Ecosystems(2024)Entrepreneurial Ecosystems have gained significant attention due to the enormous economic importance they have. The unique properties of ecosystem components, their systemic relationships, and, most significantly, the impact they have on entrepreneurial activities in various nations, are of great interest to many researchers in this field. Such influence, in turn, directly or indirectly affects the economic development and growth of countries or regions. Yet even regions with similar characteristics can display varying entrepreneurial outcomes. So, the question is why similar nations or areas have different ecosystem settings, and how does this variance impact entrepreneurial activity? Why do some ecosystems, with similar geography, size, resources, or historical context, develop entrepreneurial activities more effectively than others? Furthermore, this first main research question raises other questions like, such as: do certain ecosystem elements have more influence on the others and onto the overall system, and if so, why? Moreover, does this differential influence trigger the main antecedents of entrepreneurial outcomes? Thus, it seems that an effective and well-fitting entrepreneurial ecosystem design is a crucial point for many countries and regions which face particular difficulties in the development of the entrepreneurial sector. It is especially true for situations in which such development is necessary or desirable. The issue is mostly relevant for developing countries, or countries in transition, which have a comparatively shorter history of capitalist market economies, and therefore, in many cases, a weaker entrepreneurial culture and a lower level of entrepreneurship. It holds true for Caucasian countries like Azerbaijan or Georgia (and many other post-Soviet countries) which continue to struggle in developing a thriving entrepreneurial sector. The same challenge is observed in developing countries with different levels in industrialization or freedom. Therefore, examining the influence of the entrepreneurial ecosystems and their elements on each other and on the overall entrepreneurship level in different countries and contexts can shed more light on the issue and help policymakers to gain a deeper understanding of how such ecosystems function, including what is needed to develop better ecosystem design in order to foster entrepreneurial activity. The main purpose of this dissertation is to gain new insights into the influences resulting from entrepreneurial ecosystems’ impact on entrepreneurship. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to first gain a more detailed understanding of the entrepreneurial ecosystems, a term still in its “adolescence” in the literature. Next, within the framework of the ecosystem-entrepreneurship nexus, we establish new insights of why the effectiveness of entrepreneurship is different depending on the ecosystem setting, and which elements are important to focus on to boost the process. Such insights can contribute to the establishment of favorable ecosystems, and therefore also the entrepreneurial climate, encouraging the private sector to think about how to change existing systems and make them more fruitful for entrepreneurial development. Based on the findings regarding the influence of entrepreneurial ecosystem on entrepreneurship, the PhD thesis a) compares the development of an ecosystem in one country; b) compares two Caucasian countries within the same region and same historical date of independence, to understand how different developmental paths can occur, and which factors lead to such divergence; and c) analyzes developing countries focusing on specific aspects in their ecosystems (especially formal institutions) and their effect on entrepreneurial outcomes.Source Type:Doctoral Thesis4 14 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Access status: Open Access , The relationship between formal institutions and entrepreneurship(2021) ;Tsatsenko, NataliaThis paper explores the relationship between formal institutions and entrepreneurship. Using the international data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) and the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) projects, we show that formal institutions have a different impact on early-established and mature entrepreneurial activity rates. The relationship between formal institutional dimensions (rule of law, control of corruption, regulatory quality) and two entrepreneurial activity rates (total early-stage entrepreneurial activity and established business ownership rates) are estimated. We theorize that formal institutions create necessary conditions where both early established and mature entrepreneurship operate. Since entrepreneurship depends not only on the institutional environment but also on the stage of economic development, we conduct a cross-country analysis, including two groups of countries such as efficiency-driven and innovation-driven economies. Our empirical results confirm that in efficiency-driven countries the relationship between formal institutions and the TEA rate is more intense, while in innovation-driven countries this relationship is stronger between formal institutions and the established business ownership rate. We also discover that the rule of law plays the most important role in relation to entrepreneurial activities, meanwhile in the case of mature entrepreneurship in efficiency-driven economies; regulatory quality turns out to be more important.Source Type:Preprint5 17
