Citation Link: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:467-11360
"A free will and a will under moral laws are the same": Kant’s concept of autonomy and his thesis of analyticity in Groundwork III
Source Type
Book Part
Author
Institute
DDC
100 Philosophie
GHBS-Clases
Source
Sensen, Oliver (Hrsg.): Kant on moral autonomy. Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge University Press, 2013. - ISBN 978-1-107-00486-3, S. 225 - 245
Issue Date
2013
Abstract
In section 1 of GMS III, Kant claims that “a free will and a will under
moral laws are the same” (447.6–10). 1 h is claim expresses Kant’s concept
of autonomy; after all, the concept of freedom is the “key” (446.6) to
this concept. So if we understand freedom in its relation to morality, we
understand autonomy. But how are we to understand this relation? On
the standard reading, Kant’s claim is that a free will is under the moral
law as a Categorical Imperative (CI); hence, once it is shown that we are
free it is shown that we are obliged by the CI. 2 h is interpretation, I will
argue, is incorrect.
moral laws are the same” (447.6–10). 1 h is claim expresses Kant’s concept
of autonomy; after all, the concept of freedom is the “key” (446.6) to
this concept. So if we understand freedom in its relation to morality, we
understand autonomy. But how are we to understand this relation? On
the standard reading, Kant’s claim is that a free will is under the moral
law as a Categorical Imperative (CI); hence, once it is shown that we are
free it is shown that we are obliged by the CI. 2 h is interpretation, I will
argue, is incorrect.
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
Schoenecker_A_free_will_and_a_will_under_moral_laws_are_the_same.pdf
Size
596.45 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):4728e1a9845a38d2b63eb91cad4d76f5
Owning collection