Citation link:
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Schmidt_Are_lovers_ever_one.pdf468.29 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Dokument Type: Article
metadata.dc.title: Are lovers ever one? Reconstructing the union theory of love
Authors: Schmidt, Elke Elisabeth 
Institute: Philosophisches Seminar 
Free keywords: Love, Emotion, Union, Ontology, Definition, Cluster
Dewey Decimal Classification: 100 Philosophie und Psychologie
Issue Date: 2018
Publish Date: 2022
Source: Philosophia ; 46(2018), S. 705-719. -
Current analytical philosophies of romantic love tend to identify the essence of such love with one specific element, such as concern for the beloved person, valuing the beloved person or the union between the lovers. This paper will deal with different forms of the union theory of love which takes love to be the physical, psychic or ontological union of two persons. Prima facie, this theory might appear to be implausible because it has several contra-intuitive implications, and yet, I submit, it is more coherent and attractive than it seems to be. I shall distinguish three specific models and thereby offer a differentiated account of the union theory which has not previously been provided in the literature (1). I will claim that two of these models (the strong ontological model and the striving model) should be rejected (2). I shall then defend the third model (the moderate ontological model) against certain possible objections (3); but nevertheless, I shall conclude by showing how this model, too, faces further significant objections which ultimately expose the limits of the union theory of love (4). In conclusion, I will sketch the outlines of a non-reductive cluster theory of love.
Finanziert aus dem Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der Universität Siegen für Zeitschriftenartikel
URN: urn:nbn:de:hbz:467-21335
Appears in Collections:Geförderte Open-Access-Publikationen

This item is protected by original copyright

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Dec 7, 2023


checked on Dec 7, 2023

Google ScholarTM



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons