Albrecht-Birkner, Veronika
4 results
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Access status: Metadata only , Der sächsische Bible belt als Konstellation diskursiver Aushandlung zwischen religiösem Expert*innen und Lai*innenwissen seit dem 19. Jahrhundert(2023)Der vorliegende Beitrag nimmt die Herausbildung der Konstellation sächsischer Bible belt als Prozess diskursiver Aushandlung zwischen konkurrierenden religiösen Expert*innen und Lai*innenwissensbeständen seit dem 19. Jahrhundert in den Blick. Diese Konstellation wird unter dem Aspekt der Transformationen des Populären und somit als Konfliktgeschichte um Beachtung und Deutungshoheiten seit um 1800 untersucht. Dabei geht es um den Anspruch auf und die Zuschreibung von Expertise und somit um Rollen und Ressourcen, Legitimation und Geltung im Bereich des Religiösen. Es werden drei unterschiedliche Typen des Verhältnisses von Expert*innen und Lai*innenwissensbeständen, die sich in der Sächsischen Landeskirche herausbildeten und mehr oder weniger dauerhaft etablierten, identifiziert: ein komplementärer, ein interferierender und ein konkurrierend-abgrenzender Typ.Source Type:Article2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Access status: Metadata only , 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Access status: Metadata only , Getting Noticed by Many: On the Transformations of the PopularThis Article argues that the transformations of the popular, which began in Europe around 1800 and introduced the powerful distinction between low culture and high culture, have established a competitive distinction between the popular and the non-popular that has become dominant over the course of the 20th century. As a result, the popular is no longer either the culture of the ‘lower classes’ or the inclusion of the ‘people’ in the service of higher goals. The popular today is hardly the object of desired transgressions (Leslie Fiedler’s “cross the border, close the gap”) or an expression of felt or feared “massification” or “flattening”. Rather, being popular now means getting noticed by many. Popularity is measured as well as staged, as rankings and charts provide information on what is popular while vying for popularity themselves. These quantifying formats do not speak to the quality or originality of the popular, only to its evident success across different scales of evaluation. People do not buy good products, they buy popular ones; they do not listen to the best music, but to popular music; they do not share, like, or retweet important, but popular news. Even the ‘unpopular’ can be popular: a despised politician, a hated jingle, an unpopular measure. The popular modifies whatever it affords with attention. Its quantitatively and hierarchically comparative terms (‘bestseller,’ ‘outperformer,’ ‘high score,’ ‘viral’) generate valences that do not inhere in the objects themselves. Conversely, the non-popular, which does not find any measurable resonance in these terms, risks being dismissed as irrelevant or worthless simply because it does not appear in any rankings or ratings. This can be observed particularly with artefacts whose relevance as part of high culture may be taken for granted even when they do not achieve mass resonance. The purpose of this Article is to outline a theory of the popular that does justice to these developments by identifying two decisive transformations: 1. the popularization of quantifying methods to measure attention in popular culture around 1950; 2. the popularization of the internet around 2000, whereby the question of what can and cannot become popular is partially removed from the gatekeepers of the established mass media, educational institutions, and cultural elites and is increasingly decided via social media.Source Type:Article2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Publication Access status: Open Access , Zur Reflexivität des Populären und seinen historischen ErmöglichungsbedingungenIn its research program, the CRC 1472 ‘Transformations of the Popular’ has argued that “the long conceptual and problematic history before 1950 should be conceived as a prefigurational space of the popular” (Döring et al. 2021: 19). In this working paper, our interdisciplinary group of scholars addresses the question of how the historical dimensions of the transformations of the popular were already evident before the transformation stage around 1950. We propose to better understand the corresponding observations not as ‘prefigurations’, but as enabling conditions for the transformations of the popular. The plausibility of these assumptions is illustrated by examples from the projects of the Collaborative Research Centre, which explore the phenomena of pop, popularization, and populism not only from the mid-20th century but already from around 1800.Source Type:BookSeries:Transformationen des Populären. Working Paper Series des SFB 1472Volume number:141 2
