Zitierlink:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25819/ubsi/1895
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
WPS_15_Genner.pdf | 1.08 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Dokumentart: | Book | Titel: | To everything, turn, turn, turn? | Titelzusatz: | taking stock of the practice turn in social theory, sociology, and media studies | AutorInn(en): | Julian, Genner | Institut: | DFG-Sonderforschungsbereich 1187 "Medien der Kooperation" | Schlagwörter: | Practice Turn, Practice Theory, Sociology of the Social Sciences, Turns | DDC-Sachgruppe: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften | GHBS-Notation: | NXX KLEX |
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2020 | Publikationsjahr: | 2020 | Serie: | Working paper series / SFB 1187 Medien der Kooperation | Auch erschienen: | SFB 1187 Medien der Kooperation: Working Paper Series, No. 15, 2020. - URL: https://www001.zimt.uni-siegen.de/ojs/index.php/wps1187/issue/view/20. - ISSN: 2567-2517 | Zusammenfassung: | This article reviews the “practice turn” (PT) in sociology, social theory, and media studies. In addition, it develops a sociological perspective on turns in general. As other turns, PT presents itself as heterogeneous and interdisciplinary phenomenon lacking clear conceptual and institutional boundaries. In order to grasp this fuzziness inherent to PT, I regard PT as a “sign-post” (Wittgenstein 1984) giving rather vague directions and thus “assembling” (Latour 2005) a heterogeneous research community. Thus, my main question is as follows: How does PT guide research and how do researchers follow PT? Drawing on interviews with researchers involved in PT, I distinguish two major ideal-typical ways of following PT. Revolutionary approaches aim for overcoming existing ways of doing research by turning to practice. In contrast, reformative approaches aim for a renewal of disciplines. Whereas revolutionary approaches mainly arise in interdisciplinary fields and various “studies”, reformative approaches flourish on the margins of sociology. In exploring this pattern, the article develops a sociological way of reflecting PT and turns in general. Thereby the article establishes an institutional perspective drawing on the work of Boltanski and Chiapello (2007). |
DOI: | http://dx.doi.org/10.25819/ubsi/1895 | URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:467-16076 | URI: | https://dspace.ub.uni-siegen.de/handle/ubsi/1607 | Lizenz: | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Publikationen aus der Universität Siegen |
Diese Ressource ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. |
Seitenansichten
441
checked on 24.08.2024
Download(s)
183
checked on 24.08.2024
Google ScholarTM
Prüfe
Prüfe
Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons